Interactive Technology and Smart Education

8.5k citations
481 papers · · active since 2004

Impact in

Papers in

Interactive Technology and Smart Education

458 papers receiving 8k citations

Peers

Interactive Technology and Smart Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Information Systems and Management 1.4k
  • Computer Science Applications 626
  • Information Systems 2.7k
  • Education 2.5k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 423
Replace Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies with:
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies United States
Contemporary Educational Technology Türkiye
Journal of Computers in Education China
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning United Kingdom
International Journal of Information and Learning Technology United States
Journal of Information Technology Education Research United States
E-Learning and Digital Media United States
Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal United States
On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures United States
Journal of Computing in Higher Education United States
Interactive Technology and Smart Education relative to Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies United States Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.0×
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Interactive Technology and Smart Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interactive Technology and Smart Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interactive Technology and Smart Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interactive Technology and Smart Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Interactive Technology and Smart Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interactive Technology and Smart Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interactive Technology and Smart Education.

About Interactive Technology and Smart Education

The 481 papers published in Interactive Technology and Smart Education in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Interactive Technology and Smart Education usually cover Computer Science Applications (64 papers), Information Systems (169 papers), Human-Computer Interaction (37 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (73 papers) and Education (167 papers) specifically the topics of Online and Blended Learning (88 papers), Educational Technology and E-Learning (48 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (45 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (41 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (37 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (34 papers), Educational Technology in Learning (30 papers) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interactive Technology and Smart Education are Preeti Bhaskar, Chandan Kumar Tiwari, Jamie Costley, Muddu Vinay, Stamatios Papadakis, Mark Anthony Camilleri, Billy Tak Ming Wong, Kam Cheong Li, Charles Buabeng-Andoh and Volker H. Hegelheimer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact