Ines Meyer

1.3k citations
25 papers · 567 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Meyer

21 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Ines Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Neurology 192
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 180
  • Physiology 129
  • Neurology 42
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 31
Replace Peng Huang with:
Peng Huang China
Tuğba Tunç Türkiye
Teresa Poole United Kingdom
Eric Nelson United States
Cecily Jenkins United States
Kristine Olson United States
Susan Butler United States
Masaaki Tagawa Japan
Clair Hughes Australia
Catherine Madison United States
Ines Meyer relative to Peng Huang China Peng Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Peng Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Meyer. The network helps show where Ines Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Ines Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007466
2 201229
3 202114
4 201914
5 20228
6 20244
7 20214
8 20213
9 20163
10 20183
11 20223
12 20242
13 20202
14 20232
15 20172
16 20182
17 20121
18 20231
19 20181
20 20221

About Ines Meyer

Ines Meyer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Social Representations and Identity (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (192 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (180 citations), Physiology (129 citations), Neurology (42 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (31 citations). Ines Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Duccio Volterrani, Ian G. McKeith, John T. O’Brien, Raffaele Giubbini, P. M. Kemp, Jacques Darcourt, Cornelia Reininger, Clive Holmes, Ubaldo Bonuccelli and Klaus Tatsch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consumer Affairs, BMJ Open, Journal of Organizational Behavior, The Lancet Neurology and British Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact