Ines Meyer

26 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Ines Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 238
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 48
  • General Psychology 7
  • Social Psychology 47
Replace Chanki Moon with:
Chanki Moon United Kingdom
Deléne Visser South Africa
Craig M. Ross United States
Ivonne F Moreno-Velázquez Puerto Rico
Nicholas H.VE Smith Australia
Gwen Robinson United Kingdom
Thomas Leithäuser Germany
David E. Caughlin United States
Alicia Svensson Australia
Daniela Renger Germany
Ines Meyer relative to Chanki Moon United Kingdom Chanki Moon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Chanki Moon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Meyer. The network helps show where Ines Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Ines Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013231
2 201868
3 201226
4 201317
5 201914
6 202114
7 202210
8 20215
9 20215
10 20164
11 20244
12 20244
13 20123
14 20223
15 20233
16 20253
17 20182
18 20202
19 20171
20 20181

About Ines Meyer

Ines Meyer is a scholar working on General Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Communication and COVID-19 Impact (2 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (238 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (48 citations), General Psychology (7 citations) and Social Psychology (47 citations). Ines Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stuart Colin Carr, Darrin Hodgetts, Jane Parker, Johan Potgieter, Christian Seubert, Lucas Monzani, Nina Mareen Junker, Andreas Mojzisch, Ronit Kark and Llewellyn Ellardus van Zyl. Their work appears in journals such as Organizational Dynamics, BMJ Open, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Sustainability Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact