Ines Meyer

1.3k citations
21 papers · 506 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Meyer

18 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Ines Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Neurology 234
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 188
  • Physiology 167
  • Neurology 51
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
Replace Tuğba Tunç with:
Tuğba Tunç Türkiye
Elissa L. Ash Israel
Cecily Jenkins United States
Gregory A. Rippon United States
Emma E. Wolters Netherlands
Inger van Steenoven Netherlands
Peng Huang China
Alberto Bergareche Spain
Jacob Mirsky United States
Maria Lindau Sweden
Ines Meyer relative to Tuğba Tunç Türkiye Tuğba Tunç's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Tuğba Tunç · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Meyer. The network helps show where Ines Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Ines Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007419
2 201228
3 201914
4 202113
5 20227
6 20213
7 20243
8 20223
9 20242
10 20182
11 20172
12 20202
13 20182
14 20221
15 20181
16 20231
17 20211
18 20181
19 20121
20 20180

About Ines Meyer

Ines Meyer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (234 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (188 citations), Physiology (167 citations), Neurology (51 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations). Ines Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Tatsch, Jan Booij, Jacques Darcourt, Ubaldo Bonuccelli, Cornelia Reininger, Naji Tabet, Zuzana Walker, Raffaele Giubbini, P. M. Kemp and Duccio Volterrani. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Consumer Affairs, British Journal of Social Psychology, The Lancet Neurology and Journal of Organizational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact