Daniel Z. Ding

1.7k citations
36 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Z. Ding

33 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Z. Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 526
  • Strategy and Management 521
  • Public Administration 101
  • Communication 170
  • Accounting 258
Replace Nancy Brown Johnson with:
Nancy Brown Johnson United States
Peer Hull Kristensen Denmark
Scott E. Bryant United States
Mary B. Teagarden United States
Mary Graham United States
Ruth Alas Estonia
Andreas Werr Sweden
John McMackin Ireland
Carla Millar Netherlands
Vincent di Norcia Canada
Daniel Z. Ding relative to Nancy Brown Johnson United States Nancy Brown Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Nancy Brown Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Z. Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Z. Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Z. Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Z. Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Z. Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Z. Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Z. Ding. The network helps show where Daniel Z. Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Z. Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Z. Ding Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Z. Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008154
2 2000125
3 1997118
4 200286
5 199779
6 201368
7 200166
8 200165
9 200257
10 200657
11 200743
12 200542
13 199940
14 202434
15 200931
16 201729
17 200425
18 200223
19 199921
20 199618

About Daniel Z. Ding

Daniel Z. Ding is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (15 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (6 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (6 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (5 papers) and Conflict Management and Negotiation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (526 citations), Strategy and Management (521 citations), Public Administration (101 citations), Communication (170 citations) and Accounting (258 citations). Daniel Z. Ding has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Syed Akhtar, Gloria L. Ge, Malcolm Warner, Keith Goodall, Farong Li, Dail Fields, Dean Tjosvold, Chun Hui, Xiaoyu Wu and Irene Hau‐Siu Chow. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Journal of Global Marketing, Multinational Business Review and Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact