Dail Fields

52 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Dail Fields's Hit Papers

Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use 2010 · 581 citations
5810+5+10Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Dail Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.5k
  • Communication 555
  • Gender Studies 601
  • Public Administration 128
  • Strategy and Management 540
Replace Helen Williams with:
Helen Williams United Kingdom
Ceasar Douglas United States
Paul L. Koopman Netherlands
Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam United States
Chris J. Sablynski United States
Suzanne S. Masterson United States
Patrick C. Flood Ireland
Donald B. Fedor United States
Jeremy B. Bernerth United States
Randall P. Settoon United States
Dail Fields relative to Helen Williams United Kingdom Helen Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Helen Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dail Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dail Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dail Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dail Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dail Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dail Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dail Fields. The network helps show where Dail Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dail Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dail Fields Line = papers co-authored together Dail Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use
Hit paper breakdown →
2010581
2 2002414
3 1999339
4 2007262
5 1994231
6 2003148
7 2005148
8 2000140
9 199791
10 199786
11 201583
12 200770
13 200761
14 199755
15 200551
16 201644
17 200039
18 201138
19 201036
20 201536

About Dail Fields

Dail Fields is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Demography and General Health Professions, having authored 55 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (21 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (8 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.5k citations), Communication (555 citations), Gender Studies (601 citations), Public Administration (128 citations) and Strategy and Management (540 citations). Dail Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Terry C. Blum, Jodi S. Goodman, Samuel Aryee, Vivienne Luk, Mihai C. Bocârnea, Bruce E. Winston, Mary Pang, Catherine Chiu, David M. Herold and Syed Akhtar. Their work appears in journals such as Group & Organization Management, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Health Services Research and Leadership.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact