Dan Ispas

961 citations
30 papers · 701 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Ispas

27 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

Dan Ispas
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 276
  • Social Psychology 315
  • Applied Psychology 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
  • Gender Studies 78
Replace Patrick H. Raymark with:
Patrick H. Raymark United States
Kristine M. Kelly United States
Al K. C. Au Singapore
Pascale Desrumaux France
Mark Attridge United States
Dina Krasikova United States
Lawrence Houston United States
Brian W. McCormick United States
Nicole M. Dudley United States
Peter Belmi United States
Dan Ispas relative to Patrick H. Raymark United States Patrick H. Raymark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Patrick H. Raymark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Ispas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Ispas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Ispas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Ispas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Ispas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Ispas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Ispas. The network helps show where Dan Ispas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Ispas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Ispas Line = papers co-authored together Dan Ispas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012130
2 201796
3 201861
4 200851
5 201446
6 201134
7 201632
8 201132
9 200831
10 201821
11 201220
12 201020
13 201419
14 201217
15 201315
16 201512
17 201412
18 200912
19 201010
20 20119

About Dan Ispas

Dan Ispas is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (11 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (10 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (3 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (276 citations), Social Psychology (315 citations), Applied Psychology (66 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations) and Gender Studies (78 citations). Dan Ispas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Romania and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra Ilie, Dragoş Iliescu, Edward L. Levine, Eric D. Wesselmann, Kristen M. Shockley, Eros DeSouza, Andrei Ion, Liu‐Qin Yang, Coralia Șulea and Russell E. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences, Human Performance and Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact