Amanda Jarrell

18 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

Amanda Jarrell
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Computer Science Applications 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 188
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 140
  • Family Practice 19
  • Human-Computer Interaction 38
Replace Eric Poitras with:
Eric Poitras Canada
Anne Deiglmayr Germany
J. Elizabeth Richey United States
Christopher A. Monk United States
Tanmay Sinha Switzerland
Dragan Trninić Switzerland
Krista E. DeLeeuw United States
Andreas Obersteiner Germany
Mariya Pachman United States
Cornelia Susanne Große Germany
Amanda Jarrell relative to Eric Poitras Canada Eric Poitras's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Eric Poitras · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Jarrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Jarrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Jarrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Jarrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Jarrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Jarrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Jarrell. The network helps show where Amanda Jarrell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Jarrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Jarrell Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Jarrell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2016144
2 2020105
3 201964
4 201861
5 201757
6 201954
7 201638
8 201734
9 201428
10 202019
11 202216
12
Subgroup Discovery with User Interaction Data: An Empirically Guided Approach to Improving Intelligent Tutoring Systems
201610
13 20169
14 20169
15 20155
16 20143
17 20153
18 20151
19
Assessing teaching in higher education: Current issues, trends and recommendations
20190

About Amanda Jarrell

Amanda Jarrell is a scholar working on Family Practice, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science Applications, having authored 19 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (7 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (65 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (188 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (140 citations), Family Practice (19 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (38 citations). Amanda Jarrell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Susanne P. Lajoie, Jason M. Harley, Eric Poitras, Melissa C. Duffy, Anna‐Lena Roos, Maike Krannich, Thomas Goetz, Laura M. Naismith, Reinhard H. Pekrun and Martin Voracek. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Instruction, Educational Technology Research and Development, Educational Technology & Society, Anxiety Stress & Coping and Educational Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact