Amanda Jarrell

14 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

Amanda Jarrell
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Computer Science Applications 63
  • Human-Computer Interaction 62
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 139
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
  • Family Practice 17
Replace Melina Klepsch with:
Melina Klepsch Germany
Filip Děchtěrenko Czechia
Jennifer J. Vogel-Walcutt United States
Marlit Annalena Lindner Germany
Krista E. DeLeeuw United States
Blair Lehman United States
Wayne Leahy Australia
Shulan Lu United States
Bobby Hoffman United States
Mariya Pachman Australia
Amanda Jarrell relative to Melina Klepsch Germany Melina Klepsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Melina Klepsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Jarrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Jarrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Jarrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Jarrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Jarrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Jarrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Jarrell. The network helps show where Amanda Jarrell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Jarrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Jarrell Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Jarrell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2016114
2 202083
3 201955
4 201851
5 201748
6 201943
7 201634
8 201731
9 202017
10 202211
11 20169
12 20169
13
Subgroup Discovery with User Interaction Data: An Empirically Guided Approach to Improving Intelligent Tutoring Systems
20168
14 20143
15
Assessing teaching in higher education: Current issues, trends and recommendations
20190

About Amanda Jarrell

Amanda Jarrell is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 15 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (6 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (3 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (63 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (62 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (139 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations) and Family Practice (17 citations). Amanda Jarrell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Susanne P. Lajoie, Jason M. Harley, Eric Poitras, Melissa Duffy, Maike Krannich, Thomas Goetz, Anna‐Lena Roos, Reinhard Pekrun, Madeleine Bieg and Laura Naismith. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Instruction, Educational Technology Research and Development, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Educational Psychology Review and Instructional Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact