Alma McCarthy

2.2k citations
38 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Alma McCarthy

35 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Alma McCarthy
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 604
  • Applied Psychology 128
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 58
  • Social Psychology 335
  • Gender Studies 135
Replace T.T. Selvarajan with:
T.T. Selvarajan United States
A. R. Elangovan Canada
John P. Meriac United States
Connie Zheng Australia
Shanna R. Daniels United States
Joseph Soeters Netherlands
Paula T. Kaufman United States
Peter Bycio United States
Khalil M. Dirani United States
Joseph T. Banas United States
Alma McCarthy relative to T.T. Selvarajan United States T.T. Selvarajan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
T.T. Selvarajan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alma McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alma McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alma McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alma McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alma McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alma McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alma McCarthy. The network helps show where Alma McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alma McCarthy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alma McCarthy Line = papers co-authored together Alma McCarthy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018148
2 2011140
3 2010137
4 201296
5 200886
6 200181
7 202068
8 201864
9 200861
10 199960
11 201954
12 200846
13 202044
14 200637
15 200731
16 200729
17 201918
18 202117
19 200116
20 201414

About Alma McCarthy

Alma McCarthy is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (11 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (7 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers) and Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (604 citations), Applied Psychology (128 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (58 citations), Social Psychology (335 citations) and Gender Studies (135 citations). Alma McCarthy has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas N. Garavan, Geraldine Grady, Colette Darcy, Montgomery Van Wart, Cheol Liu, Soonhee Kim, Xiaohu Wang, Jimmy Hill, Alexandru V. Roman and Ronan Carbery. Their work appears in journals such as Human Resource Management Journal, Human Resource Management Review, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Australian Journal of Public Administration and Personnel Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact