Peter Ackers

85 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Peter Ackers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Public Administration 1.5k
  • Industrial relations 78
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 720
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 81
  • Strategy and Management 270
Replace Harry C. Katz with:
Harry C. Katz United States
Paul Blyton United Kingdom
Paul J. Gollan Australia
Peter Turnbull United Kingdom
Keith Sisson United Kingdom
Tony Dundon Ireland
Nicolas Bacon United Kingdom
Sarosh Kuruvilla United States
John Forth United Kingdom
Harvie Ramsay United Kingdom
Peter Ackers relative to Harry C. Katz United States Harry C. Katz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Harry C. Katz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ackers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ackers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ackers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ackers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ackers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ackers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ackers. The network helps show where Peter Ackers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ackers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ackers Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ackers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004321
2
The New Workplace and Trade Unionism
1995209
3 1996187
4 1998163
5 1992161
6 1991155
7 2002135
8 1994120
9 2004120
10 2002102
11 199373
12 199262
13 200562
14 201261
15 200952
16 199742
17 200541
18 200040
19 199838
20 200734

About Peter Ackers

Peter Ackers is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Industrial relations, Strategy and Management and Anthropology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (64 papers), Management Theory and Practice (10 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (7 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (4 papers), Global and Cross-Cultural Management (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Biographical and Historical Analysis (3 papers) and Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (1.5k citations), Industrial relations (78 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (720 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (81 citations) and Strategy and Management (270 citations). Peter Ackers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Adrian John Wilkinson, Mick Marchington, John Goodman, Tony Dundon, Jonathan Payne, Paul Smith, Chris M. M. Smith, Anne‐marie Greene, John W. Storey and David Coates. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Employee Relations, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Human Resource Management Journal and Journal of Industrial Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact