Michael C. Rush

36 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Michael C. Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.4k
  • Social Psychology 806
  • Gender Studies 365
  • Applied Psychology 151
  • General Psychology 36
Replace Louis C. Buffardi with:
Louis C. Buffardi United States
Gerald S. Leventhal United States
Lynn R. Offermann United States
Christopher Orpen South Africa
Roseanne J. Foti United States
Abraham K. Korman United States
Dirk D. Steiner United States
Christy L. De Vader United States
Gerald R. Ferris United States
Megan W. Gerhardt United States
Michael C. Rush relative to Louis C. Buffardi United States Louis C. Buffardi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Louis C. Buffardi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Rush. The network helps show where Michael C. Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael C. Rush Line = papers co-authored together Michael C. Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998490
2 1999336
3 1977248
4 1978183
5 2000180
6 2000131
7 199599
8 198979
9 198177
10 200166
11 198064
12 198455
13 198854
14 197739
15 199435
16 198828
17 199527
18 198726
19 197824
20 198720

About Michael C. Rush

Michael C. Rush is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers) and Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.4k citations), Social Psychology (806 citations), Gender Studies (365 citations), Applied Psychology (151 citations) and General Psychology (36 citations). Michael C. Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Tammy D. Allen, Robert G. Lord, Joyce E. A. Russell, Jay C. Thomas, Sharon L. Wagner, Charles E. Lance, Lillian T. Eby, S Barnard, James S. Phillips and Paul Panek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Sex Roles, Experimental Aging Research and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact