Experimental Aging Research

1.4k papers and 28.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Experimental Aging Research in the last decades have received a total of 28.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Aging Research usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (607 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (292 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (212 papers) specifically the topics of Memory Processes and Influences (227 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (188 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (184 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Aging Research are John J. McArdle, John L. Horn, Donald K. Ingram, Merrill F. Elias, Harvey A. Taub, A. T. Welford, M. P. Lawton, Lars Bäckman, David J. Madden and Peter J. Houx.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental Aging Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Aging Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Aging Research.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Aging Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Aging Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Aging Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Aging Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025