Jay C. Thomas

20 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Jay C. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 220
  • Strategy and Management 188
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Social Psychology 137
  • Clinical Psychology 114
Replace Uri Leviatan with:
Uri Leviatan Israel
Michael B. Hargis United States
Helen Baron United Kingdom
Harold W. Goldstein United States
Nurcan Ensari United States
Sharon Reimel de Carrasquel Venezuela
Arist von Schlippe Germany
KangHyun Shin South Korea
Maria Cristina Ferreira Brazil
Jay C. Thomas relative to Uri Leviatan Israel Uri Leviatan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Uri Leviatan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay C. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay C. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay C. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay C. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay C. Thomas. The network helps show where Jay C. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jay C. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay C. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Jay C. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977252
2 1978193
3 200154
4 200346
5 200540
6
Personality and everyday functioning
200617
7 198215
8 200214
9 201111
10
Industrial and organizational assessment
20049
11 20057
12 20025
13 20024
14 19823
15 19832
16 20062
17 20092
18 19961
19
Intervention and treatment for children and adolescents
20101
20 20171

About Jay C. Thomas

Jay C. Thomas is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Leadership and Management in Organizations (2 papers), Competency Development and Evaluation (2 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (1 paper) and Workplace Health and Well-being (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (220 citations), Strategy and Management (188 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Social Psychology (137 citations) and Clinical Psychology (114 citations). Jay C. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Rush, Robert G. Lord, John F. Binning, Michel Hersen, Ricks Warren, Catherine Miller, Daniel L. Segal, Dennis Doverspike, Douglas F. Cellar and Gerald V. Barrett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business and Psychology, Journal of Family Violence, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Behavior Modification and Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact