M. Demand

1.4k citations
51 papers · 972 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

M. Demand

49 papers receiving 941 citations

Peers

M. Demand
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 406
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 221
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 550
  • Materials Chemistry 347
  • Condensed Matter Physics 59
Replace Bong-Jun Kim with:
Bong-Jun Kim South Korea
T.G.S.M. Rijks Netherlands
V. I. Vdovin Russia
Shunji Watanabe Japan
F. Pezzimenti Italy
C. Pettiford United States
K. Suguro Japan
A.B. Granovsky Russia
Alok P. Vasudev United States
Richard Lebourgeois France
M. Demand relative to Bong-Jun Kim South Korea Bong-Jun Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Bong-Jun Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Demand

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Demand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Demand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Demand more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Demand

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Demand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Demand. The network helps show where M. Demand may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Demand, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Demand Line = papers co-authored together M. Demand links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001277
2 2013112
3 200168
4 200251
5 200251
6 201348
7 200538
8 201435
9 200930
10 201123
11 200121
12 200021
13 201121
14 200219
15 200216
16 200615
17 200813
18 200011
19 201710
20 200510

About M. Demand

M. Demand is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and devices (26 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (21 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (13 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (12 papers), Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (10 papers), Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures (6 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (5 papers) and Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (406 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (221 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (550 citations), Materials Chemistry (347 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (59 citations). M. Demand has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Luc Piraux, A. Encinas, Isabelle Huynen, U. Ebels, K. Devriendt, R. Rooyackers, Roger Loo, Andriy Hikavyy, A. Vandooren and Cedric Huyghebaert. Their work appears in journals such as Microelectronic Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact