Materials Chemistry

4.4M papers and 125.9M indexed citations i.

About

4.4M papers covering Materials Chemistry have received a total of 125.9M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science, Graphene research and applications and Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties and also cover the fields of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Some of the most active scholars covering Materials Chemistry are George M. Sheldrick, R. D. Shannon, Michaël Grätzel, A. K. Geǐm, Kostya S. Novoselov, Sumio Iijima, Louis J. Farrugia, Georg Kresse, Omar M. Yaghi and A. Paul Alivisatos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Materials Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Materials Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Materials Chemistry.

Countries where authors publish papers about Materials Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Materials Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Materials Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Materials Chemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025