Tim Kühl

871 citations
30 papers · 624 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Kühl

28 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Tim Kühl
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 370
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 272
  • Human-Computer Interaction 64
  • Automotive Engineering 91
  • Education 167
Replace Sarah Kriz with:
Sarah Kriz United States
Laura J. Massa United States
Juan C. Castro-Alonso Australia
Maria Opfermann Germany
Raedy M. Ping United States
Ulrich Glowalla Germany
Allison J. Jaeger United States
Benjamin D. Jee United States
Neil H. Schwartz United States
Joseph P. Magliano United States
Tim Kühl relative to Sarah Kriz United States Sarah Kriz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Sarah Kriz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Kühl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Kühl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Kühl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Kühl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Kühl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Kühl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Kühl. The network helps show where Tim Kühl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Tim Kühl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Kühl Line = papers co-authored together Tim Kühl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201065
2 201462
3 201052
4 201643
5 201643
6 201542
7 201434
8 201630
9 201828
10 201225
11 202124
12 201720
13 201820
14 201719
15 201818
16 201417
17 202212
18 201810
19 202210
20 20179

About Tim Kühl

Tim Kühl is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Education and Automotive Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (24 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (6 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (5 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (370 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (272 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (64 citations), Automotive Engineering (91 citations) and Education (167 citations). Tim Kühl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Eitel, Peter Gerjets, Katharina Scheiter, Stefan Münzer, Sven Gemballa, Ferdinand Stebner, Steffi Zander, Paul Ayres, Tim N. Höffler and Joachim Wirth. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Computers & Education, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning and Metacognition and Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact