Economics and Econometrics

1.9M papers and 39.3M indexed citations i.

About

1.9M papers covering Economics and Econometrics have received a total of 39.3M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth and Healthcare Policy and Management and also cover the fields of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and General Health Professions. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Finance, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Some of the most active scholars covering Economics and Econometrics are Ahmedin Jemal, Eugene F. Fama, Rebecca L. Siegel, David Moher, Michael C. Jensen, M. Hashem Pesaran, Robert J. Barro, Robert E. Lucas, Robert F. Engle and Kimberly D. Miller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Economics and Econometrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Economics and Econometrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Economics and Econometrics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Economics and Econometrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Economics and Econometrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Economics and Econometrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economics and Econometrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025