Anna Imus
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Papers in
-
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports 1
-
- Medical Education and Admissions 3
- Co-authors
- Frederick L. Oswald (6 shared papers)Neal Schmitt (5 shared papers)Stephanie Merritt (3 shared papers)Frederick P. Morgeson (1 shared paper)Ann Marie Ryan (1 shared paper)Anthony S. Boyce (1 shared paper)Smriti Shivpuri (2 shared papers)Brian H. Kim (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applied Measurement in Education (2 papers)Journal of Applied Psychology (1 paper)International Journal of Selection and Assessment (1 paper)Journal of Vocational Behavior (1 paper)Human Performance (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Anna Imus
7 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 140
- Applied Psychology 29
- Social Psychology 109
- Clinical Psychology 100
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Imus
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Imus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Imus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Imus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Imus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Imus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Imus. The network helps show where Anna Imus may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Anna Imus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 126 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 123 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 4 |
About Anna Imus
Anna Imus is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (1 paper), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (1 paper), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (140 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations), Social Psychology (109 citations), Clinical Psychology (100 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations). Anna Imus has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Frederick L. Oswald, Neal Schmitt, Stephanie Merritt, Frederick P. Morgeson, Ann Marie Ryan, Anthony S. Boyce, Smriti Shivpuri, Brian H. Kim, Patrick D. Converse and Ruchi Sinha. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Measurement in Education, Journal of Applied Psychology, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Human Performance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.