University of Michigan

16.5M citations
353.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Michigan

311.6k papers receiving 14.8M citations

Peers

University of Michigan
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Molecular Biology 2.3M
  • Social Psychology 713.6k
  • Applied Psychology 143.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 396.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 550.7k
Replace University of Toronto with:
University of Toronto Canada
University of Pittsburgh United States
University of Chicago United States
The Ohio State University United States
Northwestern University United States
University of Wisconsin–Madison United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
Michigan State University United States
Cornell University United States
Pennsylvania State University United States
University of Michigan relative to University of Toronto Canada University of Toronto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
University of Toronto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Michigan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Michigan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Michigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Michigan more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Michigan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Michigan at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Michigan at the time of their publication.

About University of Michigan

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Michigan have published 353.2k papers, which have received a total of 16.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41.4k papers in Molecular Biology, 4.6k papers in Health, 9.2k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 14.6k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 9.0k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Astro and Planetary Science (2.9k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2.5k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2.3k papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (2.2k papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2.1k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2.1k papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2.1k papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (2.3M citations), Social Psychology (713.6k citations), Applied Psychology (143.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (396.4k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (550.7k citations). Authors at University of Michigan collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Astrophysical Journal. Some of University of Michigan's most productive authors include Claes Fornell, David F. Larcker, Fred D. Davis, M. E. J. Newman, Richard P. Bagozzi, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Daniel J. Klionsky, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Paul R. Pintrich and Kent Berridge.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact