Northwestern University

167.6k papers receiving 8.4M citations

Peers

Northwestern University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1M
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 410.7k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 367.4k
  • Molecular Biology 1.3M
  • Inorganic Chemistry 253.2k
Replace University of Wisconsin–Madison with:
University of Wisconsin–Madison United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
University of Michigan United States
University of Chicago United States
University of Minnesota United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
The Ohio State University United States
Michigan State University United States
Washington University in St. Louis United States
University of Toronto Canada
Northwestern University relative to University of Wisconsin–Madison United States University of Wisconsin–Madison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
University of Wisconsin–Madison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Northwestern University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Northwestern University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Northwestern University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Northwestern University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Northwestern University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Northwestern University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Northwestern University at the time of their publication.

About Northwestern University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Northwestern University have published 189.2k papers, which have received a total of 9.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7.7k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7.2k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 13.1k papers in Surgery, 1.8k papers in Immunology and Allergy and 21.3k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2.1k papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (1.5k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.4k papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (1.3k papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (1.3k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (1.2k papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (1.2k papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1.2k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Materials Chemistry (1.1M citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (410.7k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (367.4k citations), Molecular Biology (1.3M citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (253.2k citations). Authors at Northwestern University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Chemical Society, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The Journal of Chemical Physics. Some of Northwestern University's most productive authors include Chad Alexander Mirkin, David F. Larcker, Tobin Jay Marks, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, Claes Fornell, George Chappell Schatz, Ted Belytschko, Mark A. Ratner, Richard P. Van Duyne and Joseph T. Hupp.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact