Health
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology 1.7M
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Also classified as
Health
97.1k papers receiving 994.8k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Health
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Health
This network shows the impact of papers covering Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Health.
About Health
407.0k papers covering Health have received a total of 8.5M indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Health are most often about the specific topic of Health disparities and outcomes, Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, Intimate Partner and Family Violence, Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights, Social Media in Health Education, Gun Ownership and Violence Research and Child Abuse and Trauma and also cover the fields of Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Demography. Papers citing work on Health are usually about Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Gender Studies. Some of the most active scholars covering Health are Cathy D. Sherbourne, John E. Ware, John E. Ware, Harold G. Koenig, Murray A. Straus, Sheldon Cohen, Michael Marmot, Hilary Arksey, Lisa O’Malley and Peggy A. Thoits.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.