Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

18.9M citations
155.1k papers · · active since 1951

Impact in

    • Protein Structure and Dynamics
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Immunology top 0.05%
    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology

Papers in

    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 4.8k
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 4.8k
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 4.4k
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 3.4k
    • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 2.4k

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

152.8k papers receiving 18M citations

Peers

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Molecular Biology 5.7M
  • Immunology 1M
  • Genetics 1.5M
  • Cell Biology 680.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 792.2k
Replace Nature with:
Nature United States
Science United States
Journal of Biological Chemistry United States
Cell United States
PLoS ONE United States
The EMBO Journal United States
Nucleic Acids Research United States
The Journal of Cell Biology United States
Nature Communications United States
Journal of Clinical Investigation United States
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences relative to Nature United States Nature's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nature · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

About Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The 155.1k papers published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 18.9M indexed citations . Papers published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (55k papers), Cell Biology (7.3k papers), Immunology (10.2k papers), Genetics (14.9k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (7.9k papers) specifically the topics of Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5.5k papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4.8k papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4.8k papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4.4k papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4.1k papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3.4k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3.1k papers) and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences are J. J. Hopfield, Mark E. J. Newman, Alan R. Coulson, Frederick Sanger, Th. Staehelin, Harry Towbin, Solomon H. Snyder, Masatoshi Nei, J. E. Hirsch and Robert John Tibshirani.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact