University of Pittsburgh

171.7k papers receiving 7.5M citations

Peers

University of Pittsburgh
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 511.5k
  • Biological Psychiatry 66.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 396.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 307.7k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 81.9k
Replace University of Toronto with:
University of Toronto Canada
University of Michigan United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
Cornell University United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
Columbia University United States
Duke University United States
The Ohio State University United States
University of Pittsburgh relative to University of Toronto Canada University of Toronto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Toronto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Pittsburgh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Pittsburgh. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Pittsburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Pittsburgh more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Pittsburgh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Pittsburgh at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Pittsburgh at the time of their publication.

About University of Pittsburgh

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Pittsburgh have published 183.2k papers, which have received a total of 7.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Transplantation, 7.5k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 9.1k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16.1k papers in Epidemiology and 4.5k papers in Emergency Medicine on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3.2k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2.7k papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2.1k papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2.0k papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (1.9k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (1.8k papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1.8k papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1.8k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (511.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (66.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (396.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (307.7k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (81.9k citations). Authors at University of Pittsburgh collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Immunology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Journal of Chemical Physics. Some of University of Pittsburgh's most productive authors include Thomas L. Saaty, Marilyn Kozak, Anthony A. Grace, David A. Lewis, Charles F. Reynolds, John A. Kellum, Jonathan D. Cohen, Jane A. Cauley, Anne B. Newman and Lewis H. Kuller.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact