University of Wisconsin–Madison

11.9M citations
254.8k papers ·

Impact in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Aging top 0.1%

Papers in

University of Wisconsin–Madison

230.2k papers receiving 11.0M citations

Peers

University of Wisconsin–Madison
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Molecular Biology 2.1M
  • Aging 46.1k
  • Genetics 636.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 443.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 473.6k
Replace University of Minnesota with:
University of Minnesota United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
University of Chicago United States
University of Michigan United States
Washington University in St. Louis United States
Michigan State University United States
The Ohio State University United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
Northwestern University United States
University of Iowa United States
University of Wisconsin–Madison relative to University of Minnesota United States University of Minnesota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
University of Minnesota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Wisconsin–Madison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Wisconsin–Madison. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Wisconsin–Madison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Wisconsin–Madison more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Wisconsin–Madison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Wisconsin–Madison at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Wisconsin–Madison at the time of their publication.

About University of Wisconsin–Madison

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Wisconsin–Madison have published 254.8k papers, which have received a total of 11.9M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7.4k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 35.9k papers in Molecular Biology, 5.1k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 12.5k papers in Genetics and 732 papers in Aging on the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2.9k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2.5k papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2.3k papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (2.2k papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2.0k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2.0k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.9k papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1.8k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (2.1M citations), Aging (46.1k citations), Genetics (636.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (443.3k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (473.6k citations). Authors at University of Wisconsin–Madison collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Dairy Science, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Chemical Physics. Some of University of Wisconsin–Madison's most productive authors include Folke Skoog, Toshio Murashige, Kevin W. Eliceiri, Ronald Klein, Douglas M. Bates, Richard J. Davidson, Gilbert A. Churchill, Stephen R. Carpenter, Hector F. DeLuca and Wayne S. Rasband.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact