Quadram Institute

355.4k citations
6.3k papers ·

Impact in

  • Food Science top 0.5%
    • Proteins in Food Systems
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Biotechnology top 0.5%
    • Enzyme Production and Characterization

Papers in

    • Proteins in Food Systems 310
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods 217
    • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 205

Quadram Institute

6.2k papers receiving 355.1k citations

Peers

Quadram Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Food Science 67.5k
  • Biotechnology 20.3k
  • Biochemistry 20.7k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 33.7k
  • Immunology and Allergy 6.5k
Replace Norwich Research Park with:
Norwich Research Park United Kingdom
Unilever (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority Ireland
Nestlé (Switzerland) Switzerland
Institut Pasteur de Lille France
National University of Ireland Ireland
Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen Netherlands
Roche (Switzerland) Switzerland
Centre international de recherche sur le cancer France
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research Germany
Quadram Institute relative to Norwich Research Park United Kingdom Norwich Research Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Norwich Research Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Quadram Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Quadram Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Quadram Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quadram Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Quadram Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Quadram Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Quadram Institute at the time of their publication.

About Quadram Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Quadram Institute have published 6.3k papers, which have received a total of 355.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.3k papers in Food Science, 391 papers in Biotechnology, 731 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 347 papers in Biochemistry and 138 papers in Immunology and Allergy on the topics of Food composition and properties (379 papers), Gut microbiota and health (331 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (310 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (288 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (276 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (271 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (217 papers) and Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (205 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Food Science (67.5k citations), Biotechnology (20.3k citations), Biochemistry (20.7k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (33.7k citations) and Immunology and Allergy (6.5k citations). Authors at Quadram Institute collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Food Chemistry, British Journal Of Nutrition and Applied and Environmental Microbiology. Some of Quadram Institute's most productive authors include Gary Williamson, Gene Rowe, Nathalie Juge, Lynn Jayne Frewer, Victor J. Morris, Keith W. Waldron, Peter James Wilde, József Baranyi, Paul Antony Kroon and Ian T. Johnson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact