Nutrition and Dietetics

1.0M papers and 28.1M indexed citations i.

About

1.0M papers covering Nutrition and Dietetics have received a total of 28.1M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques, Child Nutrition and Water Access and Trace Elements in Health and also cover the fields of Molecular Biology, Food Science and Plant Science. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Molecular Biology, Food Science and Physiology. Some of the most active scholars covering Nutrition and Dietetics are E. G. Bligh, W. J. Dyer, Barry Halliwell, Michael F. Holick, Philip C. Calder, Tim Cole, Charles N. Serhan, Mercedes de Onís, Artemis P. Simopoulos and Grant R. Bartlett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Nutrition and Dietetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Nutrition and Dietetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Nutrition and Dietetics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Nutrition and Dietetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Nutrition and Dietetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Nutrition and Dietetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nutrition and Dietetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025