Royal Agricultural University

155.1k citations
4.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Royal Agricultural University

3.7k papers receiving 147.4k citations

Peers

Royal Agricultural University
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Animal Science and Zoology 18.1k
  • Food Science 25.9k
  • Small Animals 9.5k
  • Computational Mathematics 787
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 9.6k
Replace Wellcome Sanger Institute with:
Wellcome Sanger Institute United Kingdom
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers France
AgroParisTech France
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement France
European Bioinformatics Institute United Kingdom
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council United Kingdom
Oniris France
Roslin Institute United Kingdom
The Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn United Kingdom
Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences Netherlands
Royal Agricultural University relative to Wellcome Sanger Institute United Kingdom Wellcome Sanger Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.2×
Wellcome Sanger Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal Agricultural University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Agricultural University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Agricultural University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Agricultural University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Agricultural University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Agricultural University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Agricultural University at the time of their publication.

About Royal Agricultural University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Agricultural University have published 4.0k papers, which have received a total of 155.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 489 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 345 papers in Small Animals, 63 papers in Equine, 342 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 560 papers in Food Science on the topics of Meat and Animal Product Quality (254 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (186 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (149 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (129 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (127 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (121 papers), Helminth infection and control (112 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (108 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Animal Science and Zoology (18.1k citations), Food Science (25.9k citations), Small Animals (9.5k citations), Computational Mathematics (787 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (9.6k citations). Authors at Royal Agricultural University collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Denmark and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, Physiologia Plantarum, Hereditas, Meat Science and International Journal of Food Microbiology. Some of Royal Agricultural University's most productive authors include Rasmus Bro, Leif H. Skibsted, Arne Astrup, Claus A. Andersson, John Elmerdahl Olsen, Louise Manning, Magne Bisgaard, Lene Jespersen, Luca Guardabassi and Hanne Ingmer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact