Zen Goh

536 citations
14 papers · 361 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Zen Goh

11 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Zen Goh
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 219
  • Social Psychology 142
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 14
  • Leadership and Management 5
  • Demography 44
Replace Neerpal Rathi with:
Neerpal Rathi India
Özge Tayfur Ekmekci Türkiye
Phillip S. Thompson United States
Kun Yu China
Megan M. Walsh Canada
Bogdan Oprea Romania
Siti Khadijah Zainal Badri Malaysia
Kuo‐Yang Kao Taiwan
Laura F. Poteat United States
Su-Ying Pan Macao
Zen Goh relative to Neerpal Rathi India Neerpal Rathi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Neerpal Rathi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zen Goh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zen Goh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zen Goh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zen Goh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zen Goh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zen Goh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zen Goh. The network helps show where Zen Goh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Zen Goh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zen Goh Line = papers co-authored together Zen Goh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2015150
2 2021110
3 201841
4 201324
5 202021
6 20185
7 20193
8 20233
9 20222
10 20261
11 20181
12 20250
13 20250
14 20240

About Zen Goh

Zen Goh is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (219 citations), Social Psychology (142 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (14 citations), Leadership and Management (5 citations) and Demography (44 citations). Zen Goh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Remus Ilieș, Kelly Schwind Wilson, Nathan Eva, Helen De Cieri, Gavin Jack, Kohyar Kiazad, Gretchen M. Spreitzer, Helen Pluut, Klodiana Lanaj and Jessica Keeney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vocational Behavior, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal of Business and Psychology, Applied Psychology and Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact