Wes Pearson

457 citations
14 papers · 376 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 13
    • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 3
    • Horticultural and Viticultural Research 10
    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 1

Wes Pearson

14 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Wes Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 70
  • Food Science 340
  • Biochemistry 107
  • Sensory Systems 27
  • Plant Science 221
Replace Alice Barker with:
Alice Barker Australia
Marcela Medel‐Marabolí Chile
Soline Caillé France
Ana Jiménez‐Cantizano Spain
Anna K. Hjelmeland United States
Luigi Picariello Italy
Valérie Lavigne-Cruège France
Frank Benkwitz New Zealand
A. Gonzalo-Diago Spain
Belinda Kemp Canada
Wes Pearson relative to Alice Barker Australia Alice Barker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alice Barker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wes Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wes Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wes Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wes Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wes Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wes Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wes Pearson. The network helps show where Wes Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wes Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wes Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Wes Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2014104
2 201862
3 201935
4 201928
5 201921
6 201620
7 202320
8 202019
9 202119
10 201717
11 202015
12 20199
13 20216
14 20251

About Wes Pearson

Wes Pearson is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (13 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (10 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (6 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (3 papers), Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (1 paper), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (1 paper) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (70 citations), Food Science (340 citations), Biochemistry (107 citations), Sensory Systems (27 citations) and Plant Science (221 citations). Wes Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include I. Leigh Francis, Helen E. Holt, Christine Mayr Marangon, David W. Jeffery, Alice Barker, John Blackman, Leigh M. Schmidtke, Markus Herderich, Tracey Siebert and Philippe Darriet. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Quality and Preference, Journal of Marketing Management and American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact