Mango Parker
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
-
- Wine Industry and Tourism
Papers in
- Food Science 32
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 31
- Biochemistry 15
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 15
- Co-authors
- Markus J. Herderich (27 shared papers)I. Leigh Francis (17 shared papers)Cory A. Black (7 shared papers)Dimitra Liacopoulos Capone (4 shared papers)David W. Jeffery (7 shared papers)Daniel Cozzolino (5 shared papers)Robert G. Dambergs (4 shared papers)Mark Gishen (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Mango Parker
32 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Biochemistry 583
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 142
- Food Science 1.4k
- Analytical Chemistry 298
- Plant Science 985
Countries citing papers authored by Mango Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Mango Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mango Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mango Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mango Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mango Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mango Parker. The network helps show where Mango Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mango Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 293 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 191 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 151 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 138 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 112 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 104 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 96 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 95 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 78 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 70 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 57 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 57 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 54 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 44 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 17 |
About Mango Parker
Mango Parker is a scholar working on Food Science, Biochemistry, Plant Science, Sensory Systems and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (31 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (19 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (15 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (5 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (583 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (142 citations), Food Science (1.4k citations), Analytical Chemistry (298 citations) and Plant Science (985 citations). Mango Parker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Markus J. Herderich, I. Leigh Francis, Cory A. Black, Dimitra Liacopoulos Capone, David W. Jeffery, Daniel Cozzolino, Robert G. Dambergs, Mark Gishen, Gayle A. Baldock and Yoji Hayasaka. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Food Chemistry, Analytica Chimica Acta and OENO One.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.