John Blackman
Impact in
-
- Wine Industry and Tourism
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Papers in
- Food Science 44
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 42
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 8
-
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 37
- Co-authors
- Leigh M. Schmidtke (33 shared papers)Christopher Steel (5 shared papers)Guillaume Antalick (14 shared papers)Andrew C. Clark (12 shared papers)Katja Šuklje (10 shared papers)Samson Agboola (1 shared paper)Anthony Saliba (7 shared papers)Alain Deloire (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
John Blackman
48 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 244
- Food Science 968
- Biochemistry 225
- Plant Science 723
- Sensory Systems 40
Countries citing papers authored by John Blackman
This map shows the geographic impact of John Blackman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Blackman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Blackman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Blackman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Blackman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Blackman. The network helps show where John Blackman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Blackman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 145 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 22 |
About John Blackman
John Blackman is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Biochemistry, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management and Molecular Biology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (42 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (37 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (12 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (11 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers) and Tea Polyphenols and Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (244 citations), Food Science (968 citations), Biochemistry (225 citations), Plant Science (723 citations) and Sensory Systems (40 citations). John Blackman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ukraine and France. Frequent co-authors include Leigh M. Schmidtke, Christopher Steel, Guillaume Antalick, Andrew C. Clark, Katja Šuklje, Samson Agboola, Anthony Saliba, Alain Deloire, Suzy Y. Rogiers and Peter J. Torley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Food Quality and Preference and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.