Thomas Eie

417 citations
11 papers · 336 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Meat and Animal Product Quality
    • Animal Nutrition and Physiology
    • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Papers in

Thomas Eie

11 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Thomas Eie
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Animal Science and Zoology 226
  • Biomaterials 91
  • Aquatic Science 36
  • Food Science 89
  • Biomedical Engineering 101
Replace Sant Saran Pathak with:
Sant Saran Pathak India
Giselle Pereira Cardoso Brazil
Salma Mohamad Yusop Malaysia
Ruth Núñez-Flores Spain
Mangalathu Rajan Vishnuraj India
Radoslav Grujić Bosnia and Herzegovina
Anne Sissel Duun Norway
Xiangyuan Wen China
Pornpot Nuthong Thailand
Thomas Eie relative to Sant Saran Pathak India Sant Saran Pathak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Sant Saran Pathak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Eie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Eie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Eie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Eie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Eie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Eie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Eie. The network helps show where Thomas Eie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Eie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Eie Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Eie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200966
2 200962
3 200755
4 200942
5 200431
6 200422
7 200418
8 201215
9 200413
10 199211
11
Pure-lac: the new milk with protected freshness and extended shelf life [a high temperature pasteurized product]
19961

About Thomas Eie

Thomas Eie is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Biomaterials, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biomedical Engineering and Food Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (2 papers), Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (1 paper) and Food Quality and Safety Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (226 citations), Biomaterials (91 citations), Aquatic Science (36 citations), Food Science (89 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (101 citations). Thomas Eie has collaborated with scholars based in Norway. Frequent co-authors include Turid Mørkøre, Anlaug Ådland Hansen, Knut Rudi, Marit Kvalvåg Pettersen, Astrid Nilsson, Marit Rødbotten, Espen Olsen, Frøydis Bjerke, Solveig Langsrud and Bjørn Christian Schirmer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Science, Packaging Technology and Science, International Journal of Food Microbiology, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Poultry Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact