Packaging Technology and Science

31.0k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
    • Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Marketing top 5%
    • Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends

Papers in

    • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging 422
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties 156
    • Advanced Cellulose Research Studies 116
    • Material Properties and Processing 469

Packaging Technology and Science

1.5k papers receiving 28.7k citations

Peers

Packaging Technology and Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
  • Biomaterials 13.0k
  • Marketing 2.9k
  • Food Science 5.6k
  • Pollution 3.5k
  • Polymers and Plastics 3.8k
Replace Food Packaging and Shelf Life with:
Food Packaging and Shelf Life China
Environmental Chemistry Letters China
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety China
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment United States
Journal of Polymers and the Environment China
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy India
Engineering China
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy China
Food Additives & Contaminants United Kingdom
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining United States
Packaging Technology and Science relative to Food Packaging and Shelf Life China Food Packaging and Shelf Life's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Food Packaging and Shelf Life · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Packaging Technology and Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Packaging Technology and Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Packaging Technology and Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Packaging Technology and Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Packaging Technology and Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Packaging Technology and Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Packaging Technology and Science.

About Packaging Technology and Science

The 1.6k papers published in Packaging Technology and Science in the last decades have received a total of 31.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Packaging Technology and Science usually cover Biomaterials (569 papers), Mechanics of Materials (500 papers), Polymers and Plastics (247 papers), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (146 papers) and Pollution (140 papers) specifically the topics of Material Properties and Processing (469 papers), Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (422 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (178 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (156 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (137 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (134 papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (116 papers) and Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Packaging Technology and Science are S. Paul Singh, Yves Wyser, Jakob Lange, Zhiwei Wang, Vincent Rouillard, Helén Williams, Caisa Andersson, Joseph H. Hotchkiss, Rolf D. Joerger and Gary Burgess.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact