Robert McBride

47 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers

Robert McBride
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Sensory Systems 261
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 415
  • Food Science 415
  • Animal Science and Zoology 138
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 108
Replace Herbert Stone with:
Herbert Stone United States
Tracey Hollowood United Kingdom
Maria A. A. P. da Silva Brazil
Francis J. Pilgrim United States
Camilla Cattaneo Italy
H. Stone United States
Jeannine Delwiche United States
Elizabeth H. Zandstra Netherlands
Jean A. McEwan United Kingdom
Richard Popper United States
Robert McBride relative to Herbert Stone United States Herbert Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Herbert Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert McBride

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert McBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert McBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert McBride more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert McBride

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert McBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert McBride. The network helps show where Robert McBride may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert McBride, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert McBride Line = papers co-authored together Robert McBride links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198381
2 201652
3 201249
4 198747
5 201645
6 201644
7
An Interlaboratory Study of Firmness, Aroma, and Taste of Pectin Gels
198643
8
Psychological Basis of Sensory Evaluation
199041
9 198336
10 198235
11 198632
12 198532
13 199029
14 198926
15 201725
16 201725
17 198624
18 197623
19 200022
20 200821

About Robert McBride

Robert McBride is a scholar working on Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biomedical Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 50 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (19 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (17 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (10 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (261 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (415 citations), Food Science (415 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (138 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (108 citations). Robert McBride has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen E. Lacy, Julia Low, Russell Keast, David C. Finlay, Robert L. Johnson, H.J.H. MacFie, David Booth, David G. Laing, Daniel H. Goldhill and Yorgo Modis. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Science & Technology, Chemical Senses, Journal of Food Science, British Poultry Science and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact