Robert McBride

49 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Robert McBride
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Sensory Systems 279
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 446
  • Food Science 464
  • Animal Science and Zoology 159
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
Replace Herbert Stone with:
Herbert Stone United States
Francis J. Pilgrim United States
H. Stone United States
Tracey Hollowood United Kingdom
Maria A. A. P. da Silva Brazil
Isabella Endrizzi Italy
Jos Mojet Netherlands
M.R. McDaniel United States
David R. Peryam United States
Kevin Kantono New Zealand
Robert McBride relative to Herbert Stone United States Herbert Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Herbert Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert McBride

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert McBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert McBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert McBride more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert McBride

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert McBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert McBride. The network helps show where Robert McBride may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert McBride, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert McBride Line = papers co-authored together Robert McBride links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198389
2 201653
3 198751
4 198249
5 201249
6
Psychological Basis of Sensory Evaluation
199047
7 201646
8
An Interlaboratory Study of Firmness, Aroma, and Taste of Pectin Gels
198645
9 201645
10 198544
11 199041
12 198337
13 198636
14 198929
15 198628
16 197626
17 201725
18 201725
19 200024
20 197522

About Robert McBride

Robert McBride is a scholar working on Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biomedical Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (19 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (17 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (10 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (3 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (279 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (446 citations), Food Science (464 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (159 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations). Robert McBride has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Russell Keast, Kathleen E. Lacy, Julia Low, David C. Finlay, Robert L. Johnson, H.J.H. MacFie, David Booth, David G. Laing, Moshe Dessau and Daniel H. Goldhill. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Science & Technology, Chemical Senses, Journal of Food Science, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and British Poultry Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact