Herbert Stone
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 19
-
- Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 19
- Co-authors
- Shirley M. Oliver (5 shared papers)Joel L. Sidel (3 shared papers)Gordon T. Pryor (6 shared papers)Rebecca N. Bleibaum (1 shared paper)Saïd Labrèche (1 shared paper)Charles S. Rebert (1 shared paper)Edward M. Acton (1 shared paper)Rose Marie Pangborn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Food Science (8 papers)Journal of Applied Physiology (2 papers)Food Quality and Preference (2 papers)npj Science of Food (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesArmenia
In The Last Decade
Herbert Stone
36 papers receiving 889 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Sensory Systems 306
- Nutrition and Dietetics 348
- Food Science 264
- Animal Science and Zoology 117
- General Psychology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Stone. The network helps show where Herbert Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Herbert Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 138 | |
| 2 | 1969 | 112 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 90 | |
| 4 | 1965 | 77 | |
| 5 | 1963 | 65 | |
| 6 | 1968 | 55 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 44 | |
| 8 | 1970 | 34 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1981 | 31 | |
| 11 | 1960 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1970 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1972 | 19 | |
| 16 | 1970 | 19 | |
| 17 | 1966 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1963 | 15 |
About Herbert Stone
Herbert Stone is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering, Nutrition and Dietetics, Insect Science and Food Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (19 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (19 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (9 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (9 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (6 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (306 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (348 citations), Food Science (264 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (117 citations) and General Psychology (13 citations). Herbert Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include Shirley M. Oliver, Joel L. Sidel, Gordon T. Pryor, Rebecca N. Bleibaum, Saïd Labrèche, Charles S. Rebert, Edward M. Acton, Rose Marie Pangborn, C. S. Ough and Austin E. Grigg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Science, Journal of Applied Physiology, Food Quality and Preference, npj Science of Food and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.