David Booth

385 papers receiving 10.2k citations

David Booth's Hit Papers

Developmental patrimonialism? The case of Rwanda 2012 · 275 citations
2750+4+9Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

David Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 2.7k
  • Sensory Systems 1.2k
  • Development 740
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 2.5k
  • Physiology 2.5k
Replace E. Leigh Gibson with:
E. Leigh Gibson United Kingdom
William H. Frey United States
Robert Lalonde France
Trey Sunderland United States
John T. Williams United States
Allan H. Young United Kingdom
Elissa S. Epel United States
Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh United Kingdom
John S. Strauss United States
Marcus R. Munafò United Kingdom
David Booth relative to E. Leigh Gibson United Kingdom E. Leigh Gibson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
E. Leigh Gibson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Booth. The network helps show where David Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Booth Line = papers co-authored together David Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 408 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Developmental patrimonialism? The case of Rwanda
Hit paper breakdown →
2012275
2 1972253
3 1985236
4 1968227
5 1982215
6
Food acceptance and nutrition.
1987196
7 1972190
8 1985183
9 2005176
10 1972154
11 1995152
12 1967149
13 1972144
14 2012142
15
Hunger models : computable theory of feeding control
1978138
16 1976138
17
Thirst: Physiological and Psychological Aspects
1991137
18 2004136
19 1968133
20 1970133

About David Booth

David Booth is a scholar working on Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science and Sensory Systems, having authored 408 papers that have together received 11.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (66 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (65 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (45 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (40 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (38 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (25 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (23 papers) and International Development and Aid (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (2.7k citations), Sensory Systems (1.2k citations), Development (740 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (2.5k citations) and Physiology (2.5k citations). David Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frederick Golooba‐Mutebi, E. Leigh Gibson, Mark Conner, D. Lovett, Gareth J. Treharne, Peter B. Mather, Rosemary G. Platts, Simon Bowman, George D. Kitas and Barbara Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Physiology & Behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Development Policy Review and British Food Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact