David Booth

14.8k citations
406 papers · 11.9k · h-index 60

Impact in

Papers in

David Booth

384 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Peers

David Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 4.4k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 2.2k
  • Development 440
  • Sensory Systems 350
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 848
Replace Mark A. Hanson with:
Mark A. Hanson United Kingdom
Gonneke A. H. M. Willemsen Netherlands
Evelin Mihailov United Kingdom
Ivana Kolčić Croatia
Judith Rodin United States
Lili A. Milani Estonia
Tune H. Pers Denmark
Michael Edward Goddard Australia
Jianxin Shi United States
Susan M. Ring United Kingdom
David Booth relative to Mark A. Hanson United Kingdom Mark A. Hanson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×100×146.7×
Mark A. Hanson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Booth. The network helps show where David Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Booth Line = papers co-authored together David Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 406 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972255
2 2012248
3 1985231
4 1968222
5 1982217
6
Food acceptance and nutrition.
1987193
7 1972191
8 1985176
9 2005172
10 1972155
11 2004155
12 1967144
13 1972142
14 1995142
15 1976138
16
Hunger models : computable theory of feeding control
1978136
17
Thirst: Physiological and Psychological Aspects
1991136
18 2012134
19 1968133
20 1970132

About David Booth

David Booth is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Development, Food Science and Sensory Systems, having authored 406 papers that have together received 11.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (149 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (52 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (40 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (24 papers), International Development and Aid (23 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (23 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (21 papers) and African Studies and Ethnography (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (4.4k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (2.2k citations), Development (440 citations), Sensory Systems (350 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (848 citations). David Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edward Leigh Gibson, Frederick Golooba‐Mutebi, Mark T. Conner, Gareth J. Treharne, Rosemary G. Platts, Simon Bowman, Frederick M. Toates, George D. Kitas, Antonia C. Lyons and David J. Ramsay. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Physiology & Behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Nature and Development Policy Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact