Jane Slaughter

678 citations
17 papers · 504 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Slaughter

16 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Jane Slaughter
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Public Administration 181
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 175
  • Management Information Systems 85
  • Strategy and Management 102
  • General Health Professions 80
Replace Don Wells with:
Don Wells Canada
Michael Schuster United States
Janet C. Vinzant United States
Alisa Hicklin United States
John A. McClendon United States
Ray Fells Australia
Kazuo Koike Japan
Willow S. Jacobson United States
Peter Butler United Kingdom
Marilyn Carroll United Kingdom
Jane Slaughter relative to Don Wells Canada Don Wells's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Don Wells · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Slaughter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Slaughter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Slaughter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Slaughter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Slaughter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Slaughter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Slaughter. The network helps show where Jane Slaughter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jane Slaughter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Slaughter Line = papers co-authored together Jane Slaughter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1992328
2 199356
3
Working smart : a union guide to participation programs and reengineering
199449
4 199020
5
European Women on the Left: Socialism, Feminism, and the Problems Faced by Political Women, 1880 to the Present
198114
6
Concessions, and How to Beat Them
198310
7 19948
8 19994
9
A Troublemaker’s Handbook 2
20054
10 19983
11 20112
12
Jane Slaughter Responds
19961
13
Dealing With Good Management
19891
14 20061
15 19981
16 19841
17 20181

About Jane Slaughter

Jane Slaughter is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper), Transport and Economic Policies (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Corporate Governance and Law (1 paper), Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper) and Political theory and Gramsci (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (181 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (175 citations), Management Information Systems (85 citations), Strategy and Management (102 citations) and General Health Professions (80 citations). Jane Slaughter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mike Parker and Don Wells. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Review, Labour / Le Travail, Labor Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas, Journal of Modern Italian Studies and Journal of Organizational Change Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact