Ping Ping Fu

982 citations
11 papers · 626 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Ping Fu

11 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Ping Ping Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 362
  • Communication 116
  • Social Psychology 247
  • Strategy and Management 135
  • Information Systems and Management 45
Replace Ann Yan Zhang with:
Ann Yan Zhang China
Clint Relyea United States
Elizabeth McClean United States
Mahfooz A. Ansari Canada
Irene Hau Siu Chow Hong Kong
Byoung Kwon Choi South Korea
Hein Wendt Belgium
Sudhir K. Saha Canada
Inju Yang France
Jacob W. Breland United States
Ping Ping Fu relative to Ann Yan Zhang China Ann Yan Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ann Yan Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Ping Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Ping Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Ping Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Ping Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Ping Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Ping Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Ping Fu. The network helps show where Ping Ping Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Ping Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Ping Fu Line = papers co-authored together Ping Ping Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2010192
2 2004165
3 2000152
4 200349
5 200620
6 201218
7 201414
8 201212
9 20182
10
Are values at the societal-level acceptable as cross-cultural predictors in today's global economy?
20121
11
Relational power matters: Evidence from multilevel tests between East and West
20111

About Ping Ping Fu

Ping Ping Fu is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper) and International Student and Expatriate Challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (362 citations), Communication (116 citations), Social Psychology (247 citations), Strategy and Management (135 citations) and Information Systems and Management (45 citations). Ping Ping Fu has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Gary Yukl, Jun Liu, Anne S. Tsui, Michael Harris Bond, Robert McDonald, T. K. Peng, Jasmine Tata, Jaap Boonstra, Jeffrey C. Kennedy and E. S. Srinivas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, Asia Pacific Journal of Management and The Leadership Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact