Nicole Pyle

633 citations
18 papers · 401 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nicole Pyle

17 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Nicole Pyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 262
  • Safety Research 60
  • Statistics and Probability 54
  • Education 189
  • Clinical Psychology 66
Replace Kelli D. Cummings with:
Kelli D. Cummings United States
Candace A. Mulcahy United States
Milena A. Keller‐Margulis United States
Endia J. Lindo United States
Amanda Thomas United States
Carmen Arreaga‐Mayer United States
Cevriye Ergül Türkiye
Joseph Betts United States
Joseph F. T. Nese United States
Terrence Tivnan United States
Nicole Pyle relative to Kelli D. Cummings United States Kelli D. Cummings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Kelli D. Cummings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicole Pyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole Pyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole Pyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole Pyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole Pyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole Pyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole Pyle. The network helps show where Nicole Pyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Nicole Pyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicole Pyle Line = papers co-authored together Nicole Pyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011101
2 201768
3 201336
4 201125
5 201525
6 201523
7 201622
8 201221
9 201321
10 201113
11 201112
12 201911
13 20129
14 20227
15 20213
16 20112
17 20152
18
Efficacy of an Individualized Reading Intervention with Secondary Students.
20120

About Nicole Pyle

Nicole Pyle is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability, Safety Research and Clinical Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (7 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers), Disability Education and Employment (4 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (262 citations), Safety Research (60 citations), Statistics and Probability (54 citations), Education (189 citations) and Clinical Psychology (66 citations). Nicole Pyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Vaughn, Jade Wexler, Michael Solís, Audrey J. Leroux, Stephen Ciullo, Jacob Williams, Andrea Flower, Benjamin Lignugaris Kraft, Jessica S. Akers and Deborah K. Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Educational Research, Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Psychology in the Schools and The Urban Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact