Lidia Tomás‐Cobos

1.0k citations
19 papers · 757 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Lidia Tomás‐Cobos

18 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

Lidia Tomás‐Cobos
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 152
  • Food Science 155
  • Biochemistry 45
  • Physiology 156
  • Biochemistry 33
Replace Stephanie Jew with:
Stephanie Jew Canada
Maria Speth Germany
Paula Aranaz Spain
Shanping He China
Asuka Kamei Japan
Tianyi Guo China
R. Bodkowski Poland
Ae Wha Ha South Korea
Thibault Sutra France
Sho Nishikawa Japan
Lidia Tomás‐Cobos relative to Stephanie Jew Canada Stephanie Jew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Stephanie Jew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lidia Tomás‐Cobos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lidia Tomás‐Cobos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lidia Tomás‐Cobos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lidia Tomás‐Cobos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lidia Tomás‐Cobos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lidia Tomás‐Cobos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lidia Tomás‐Cobos. The network helps show where Lidia Tomás‐Cobos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lidia Tomás‐Cobos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lidia Tomás‐Cobos Line = papers co-authored together Lidia Tomás‐Cobos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2015221
2 2011126
3 201757
4 200255
5 200444
6 201943
7 201839
8 202334
9 201733
10 201525
11 200522
12 202018
13 201916
14 202014
15 20235
16 20082
17 20072
18
Bases moleculares del proceso de inducción génica por glucosa.
20071
19 20220

About Lidia Tomás‐Cobos

Lidia Tomás‐Cobos is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (2 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Food composition and properties (2 papers) and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (152 citations), Food Science (155 citations), Biochemistry (45 citations), Physiology (156 citations) and Biochemistry (33 citations). Lidia Tomás‐Cobos has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Pascual Sanz, Alessandra Bordoni, Doreen Gille, Barbara Walther, Guy Vergères, Danit R. Shahar, Didier Dupont, Paula Pinto, Catherine Postic and Didier Rémond. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, Yeast, Journal of Functional Foods, Journal of Hepatology and Molecular Nutrition & Food Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact