Journal of Functional Foods

6.2k papers and 166.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.2k papers published in Journal of Functional Foods in the last decades have received a total of 166.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Functional Foods usually cover Molecular Biology (2.7k papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.3k papers) and Food Science (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (889 papers), Gut microbiota and health (659 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (554 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Functional Foods are Fereidoon Shahidi, Priyatharini Ambigaipalan, Se‐Kwon Kim, Hannu Korhonen, Eunice C.Y. Li‐Chan, Richard J. Fitzgerald, Anoma Chandrasekara, Milda E. Embuscado, Ying Zhong and Saroj Kumar Giri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Functional Foods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Functional Foods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Functional Foods.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Functional Foods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Functional Foods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Functional Foods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Functional Foods more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025