Jill Pearson

619 citations
13 papers · 460 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research 4
    • Youth Development and Social Support 2
    • Career Development and Diversity 2
    • Disability Education and Employment 1

Jill Pearson

11 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Jill Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 114
  • Education 188
  • Communication 43
  • Applied Psychology 16
  • Safety Research 28
Replace Christopher M. Branson with:
Christopher M. Branson Australia
Abdullah Abu-Tineh Qatar
John Schulz United Kingdom
John R. Hoyle United States
G.M. Steyn South Africa
Lawrence Leonard United States
Dudley B. Woodard United States
Don G. Creamer United States
Karsten E. Zegwaard New Zealand
Alan Floyd United Kingdom
Jill Pearson relative to Christopher M. Branson Australia Christopher M. Branson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Christopher M. Branson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jill Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Pearson. The network helps show where Jill Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jill Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jill Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Jill Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2001156
2 2008137
3 198870
4 201227
5 198823
6 202219
7 198611
8 19889
9 19865
10 20202
11 20091
12 20250
13 20170

About Jill Pearson

Jill Pearson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Safety Research, Education, Communication and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (4 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (2 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (2 papers), Career Development and Diversity (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Disability Education and Employment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (114 citations), Education (188 citations), Communication (43 citations), Applied Psychology (16 citations) and Safety Research (28 citations). Jill Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claire W. Armstrong, Patrick C. Flood, Thomas Turner, Nagarajan Ramamoorthy, Catherine Johnson, Brian R. Flay, J. A. Graham, Bonnie H. Wolkenstein, William B. Hansen and Michelle Hammond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Education, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Career Development International, Journal of Management Development and Journal of Drug Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact