John Schulz

22 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

John Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 69
  • Computer Science Applications 33
  • Gender Studies 32
  • Social Psychology 55
  • Communication 17
Replace Boreum Ju with:
Boreum Ju United States
Michelle Bartlett United States
Janice Witt Smith United States
Thaís Zerbini Brazil
Earnest Friday United States
Pilar Martín Spain
Durdağı Akan Türkiye
Joseph “Mick” La Lopa United States
Quinn Galbraith United States
Azizah Rajab Malaysia
John Schulz relative to Boreum Ju United States Boreum Ju's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Boreum Ju · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Schulz. The network helps show where John Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside John Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Schulz Line = papers co-authored together John Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201379
2 200640
3 200733
4 201429
5 202022
6 201619
7 20099
8 19639
9 20207
10
Women’s Football: Still in the Hands of Men
20115
11 20104
12 20224
13 20094
14 20113
15 20152
16
Paid staff in voluntary sporting organisations. Do they help or hinder
20052
17 20192
18 20211
19
Paid staff in voluntary sporting organisations
20041
20
Enriching education: an exploration of the benefits and outcomes of a VSO placement for teachers and schools in the UK
20081

About John Schulz

John Schulz is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (6 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (5 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (3 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (2 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (69 citations), Computer Science Applications (33 citations), Gender Studies (32 citations), Social Psychology (55 citations) and Communication (17 citations). John Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher John Auld, Michael D. Watkins, David E. Millard, Luke Greenacre, Anthony E. Kelly, Hugh Davis and Geoff Nichols. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Learning Technology, Leisure/Loisir, Contemporary Educational Technology, Higher Education Research & Development and Sport Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact