Jane O’Reilly

21 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Jane O’Reilly
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 553
  • Social Psychology 691
  • Information Systems and Management 148
  • Health 157
  • Gender Studies 122
Replace Lindie H. Liang with:
Lindie H. Liang Canada
Changya Hu Taiwan
Jeremy Ray Brees United States
Pauline Schilpzand United States
Mickey B. Smith United States
Cong Liu United States
M. Gloria González‐Morales Canada
Michael B. Hargis United States
Christian Thoroughgood United States
Laurie J. Barclay Canada
Jane O’Reilly relative to Lindie H. Liang Canada Lindie H. Liang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Lindie H. Liang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane O’Reilly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane O’Reilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane O’Reilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane O’Reilly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane O’Reilly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane O’Reilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane O’Reilly. The network helps show where Jane O’Reilly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane O’Reilly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane O’Reilly Line = papers co-authored together Jane O’Reilly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012374
2 2014222
3 2011124
4 2012100
5 201599
6 201698
7 200971
8 201160
9 201958
10 201128
11 201425
12 201917
13 201916
14 201915
15 20093
16
No turning back : two nuns' battle with the Vatican over women's right to choose
19903
17
The girl I left behind
19803
18 20211
19 20161
20 20171

About Jane O’Reilly

Jane O’Reilly is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers) and Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (553 citations), Social Psychology (691 citations), Information Systems and Management (148 citations), Health (157 citations) and Gender Studies (122 citations). Jane O’Reilly has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sandra L. Robinson, Karl Aquino, Wang Wei, Jennifer L. Berdahl, Daniel P. Skarlicki, Silvia Bonaccio, Kirsten Robertson, Angela C. Wolff, François Chiocchio and Sharon L. O’Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management, Research in Organizational Behavior, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact