Jaclyn Koopmann

1.0k citations
21 papers · 767 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jaclyn Koopmann

20 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers

Jaclyn Koopmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 427
  • Applied Psychology 90
  • Social Psychology 217
  • Demography 72
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
Replace Michael R. Parke with:
Michael R. Parke United States
Richard Hermida United States
Brian W. McCormick United States
Clare L. Barratt United States
Shuhua Sun United States
Daniel W. Newton United States
Brian C. Holtz United States
John Fiset Canada
Jaclyn Koopmann relative to Michael R. Parke United States Michael R. Parke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael R. Parke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaclyn Koopmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaclyn Koopmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaclyn Koopmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaclyn Koopmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaclyn Koopmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaclyn Koopmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaclyn Koopmann. The network helps show where Jaclyn Koopmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaclyn Koopmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaclyn Koopmann Line = papers co-authored together Jaclyn Koopmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015102
2 2016102
3 2017102
4 201891
5 201677
6 201867
7 202065
8 202135
9 201732
10 202331
11 202018
12 202113
13 202111
14 20178
15 20244
16 20144
17 20232
18 20241
19 20221
20 20211

About Jaclyn Koopmann

Jaclyn Koopmann is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 767 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (427 citations), Applied Psychology (90 citations), Social Psychology (217 citations), Demography (72 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations). Jaclyn Koopmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Mo Wang, Junqi Shi, Klodiana Lanaj, Yihao Liu, Yifan Song, Weipeng Lin, Peter Bamberger, Le Zhou, Joyce E. Bono and Chu‐Hsiang Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Work Aging and Retirement and European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact