George Michaelides

32 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

George Michaelides
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Transplantation 71
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 132
  • Social Psychology 86
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Nephrology 21
Replace Mark O’Donnell with:
Mark O’Donnell United States
Jill B. Jones United States
Susan Whittaker Canada
Tracy H. Porter United States
Joshua M. Bentley United States
Jaime Windeler United States
Kevin Hill Canada
Yogesh P. Pai India
S. Kyle Hight United States
Simon Smith United Kingdom
George Michaelides relative to Mark O’Donnell United States Mark O’Donnell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark O’Donnell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Michaelides

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Michaelides's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Michaelides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Michaelides more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Michaelides

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Michaelides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Michaelides. The network helps show where George Michaelides may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Michaelides, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Michaelides Line = papers co-authored together George Michaelides links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201462
2 201251
3 201544
4 202129
5 201726
6 201624
7 201323
8 201919
9 202213
10 201713
11 202013
12 201511
13 19739
14 20198
15 20227
16 20207
17 20116
18 20225
19 20234
20 20224

About George Michaelides

George Michaelides is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (3 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers) and Software Engineering Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (71 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (132 citations), Social Psychology (86 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations) and Nephrology (21 citations). George Michaelides has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Wood, C. J. Thomson, Maria Karanika‐Murray, Kevin Daniels, Karen Niven, Duncan J. R. Jackson, R. S. Vaughan, Peter Totterdell, Nizam Mamode and Olivia Shaw. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, Human Performance and Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact