Transplantation

104.0k papers and 2.0M indexed citations i.

About

104.0k papers covering Transplantation have received a total of 2.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments, Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes and Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research and also cover the fields of Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nephrology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology. Some of the most active scholars covering Transplantation are Gerhard Opelz, Paul I. Terasaki, Philip F. Halloran, Bertram L. Kasiske, Thomas E. Starzl, Barry D. Kahan, Bruce Kaplan, David E.R. Sutherland, Jeremy R. Chapman and Arthur J. Matas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Transplantation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Transplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Transplantation.

Countries where authors publish papers about Transplantation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Transplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Transplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transplantation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025