Daniel Bodemer

69 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel Bodemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.0k
  • Communication 390
  • Computer Science Applications 287
  • Education 681
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 304
Replace Gellof Kanselaar with:
Gellof Kanselaar Netherlands
Karsten Stegmann Germany
Femke Kirschner Netherlands
Ingo Kollar Germany
Jerry Andriessen Netherlands
Heisawn Jeong South Korea
Sadhana Puntambekar United States
Daniel C. Moos United States
Kristine Lund France
Dan Suthers United States
Daniel Bodemer relative to Gellof Kanselaar Netherlands Gellof Kanselaar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Gellof Kanselaar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bodemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bodemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bodemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bodemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bodemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bodemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bodemer. The network helps show where Daniel Bodemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bodemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bodemer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bodemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004172
2 2013166
3 2010131
4 2017102
5 201086
6 200584
7 200979
8 200874
9 200572
10 201958
11 201048
12 202139
13 201839
14 202234
15 201030
16 201630
17 201427
18 200924
19 202223
20 202119

About Daniel Bodemer

Daniel Bodemer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Communication, Education, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (52 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (24 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (14 papers), Online and Blended Learning (13 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (13 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (11 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.0k citations), Communication (390 citations), Computer Science Applications (287 citations), Education (681 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (304 citations). Daniel Bodemer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jessica Dehler, Jürgen Buder, Jeroen Janssen, Lenka Schnaubert, Rolf Ploetzner, Hans Spada, U. Faust, Friedrich W. Hesse, Tanja Engelmann and H. Ulrich Hoppe. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Computers in Human Behavior, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, Learning and Instruction and Social Psychology of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact