C. William Roe

542 citations
23 papers · 395 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

C. William Roe

22 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

C. William Roe
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 223
  • Information Systems and Management 34
  • Social Psychology 99
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 7
  • Public Administration 13
Replace Robert Knoop with:
Robert Knoop Canada
Sharon Turnbull United Kingdom
Patricia G. Martínez United States
Matthew Liao‐Troth United States
Rob Goffee United Kingdom
Howard M. Berkson United States
Shari L. Peterson United States
Dafna Eylon United States
Yongqing Fang Singapore
Brendan D. Bannister United States
C. William Roe relative to Robert Knoop Canada Robert Knoop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Robert Knoop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. William Roe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. William Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. William Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. William Roe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. William Roe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. William Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. William Roe. The network helps show where C. William Roe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside C. William Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. William Roe Line = papers co-authored together C. William Roe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199382
2 199978
3 199650
4 199649
5 199735
6 199728
7 199813
8 201211
9 20118
10 20158
11 20107
12
Quaint little Wolfgang.
19715
13 19945
14 19714
15 19942
16 19972
17 20112
18 19732
19 19931
20 20011

About C. William Roe

C. William Roe is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Accounting, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 23 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting (3 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers) and Management and Marketing Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (223 citations), Information Systems and Management (34 citations), Social Psychology (99 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (7 citations) and Public Administration (13 citations). C. William Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paula Phillips Carson, Kerry D. Carson, Stephen B. Knouse and Uday S. Tate. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Career Development, Public Personnel Management, Journal of Business and Psychology, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact