C. William Roe

586 citations
27 papers · 424 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

C. William Roe

26 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

C. William Roe
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 232
  • Social Psychology 102
  • Information Systems and Management 35
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 7
  • Demography 47
Replace Robert Knoop with:
Robert Knoop Canada
Sharon Turnbull United Kingdom
Matthew Liao‐Troth United States
Patricia G. Martínez United States
Yongqing Fang Singapore
Howard M. Berkson United States
Rob Goffee United Kingdom
Dafna Eylon United States
Shari L. Peterson United States
Christine L. Scheck United States
C. William Roe relative to Robert Knoop Canada Robert Knoop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Robert Knoop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. William Roe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. William Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. William Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. William Roe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. William Roe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. William Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. William Roe. The network helps show where C. William Roe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside C. William Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. William Roe Line = papers co-authored together C. William Roe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199382
2 199978
3 199650
4 199649
5 199735
6 199728
7 199818
8 199813
9 201211
10 20158
11 20118
12 20107
13 19986
14 19945
15
Quaint little Wolfgang.
19715
16 19714
17 19983
18 20112
19 19972
20 19942

About C. William Roe

C. William Roe is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 27 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (232 citations), Social Psychology (102 citations), Information Systems and Management (35 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (7 citations) and Demography (47 citations). C. William Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paula Phillips Carson, Kerry D. Carson, Stephen B. Knouse and Uday S. Tate. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Career Development, The Health Care Manager, Public Personnel Management, The Medical Journal of Australia and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact