Benoît Bach
Impact in
- Food Science top 2%
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Papers in
- Food Science 16
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 13
-
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 8
- GABA and Rice Research 2
- Co-authors
- Aude Vernhet (2 shared papers)François‐Xavier Sauvage (2 shared papers)Michel Moutounet (1 shared paper)Sylvie Dequin (3 shared papers)Vittorio Capozzi (2 shared papers)Luciano Beneduce (2 shared papers)Giuseppe Spano (2 shared papers)Francesco Grieco (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Food Chemistry (4 papers)Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research (1 paper)Food Control (1 paper)OENO One (1 paper)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Benoît Bach
25 papers receiving 674 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Food Science 376
- Biochemistry 74
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 20
- Biotechnology 79
- Plant Science 234
Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Bach
This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Bach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Bach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Bach. The network helps show where Benoît Bach may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 7 |
About Benoît Bach
Benoît Bach is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (13 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (6 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (3 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (3 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (3 papers) and GABA and Rice Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (376 citations), Biochemistry (74 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (20 citations), Biotechnology (79 citations) and Plant Science (234 citations). Benoît Bach has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Aude Vernhet, François‐Xavier Sauvage, Michel Moutounet, Sylvie Dequin, Vittorio Capozzi, Luciano Beneduce, Giuseppe Spano, Francesco Grieco, Carole Camarasa and Hervé Alexandre. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Food Control, OENO One and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.