Agnes Nocon

1k citations
18 papers · 808 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Agnes Nocon

16 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

Agnes Nocon
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 102
  • Clinical Psychology 255
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 204
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 123
  • Pharmacology 99
Replace Rachel E. Bender with:
Rachel E. Bender United States
Sandra M. Villafuerte United States
Stephanie Sadler United Kingdom
Kate Redman United Kingdom
Jen Vittum United States
Abram Sterne United Kingdom
Jessie Mahler Germany
Natalie D. Weder United States
R. Katz Canada
Martin L. Korn United States
Agnes Nocon relative to Rachel E. Bender United States Rachel E. Bender's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Rachel E. Bender · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Agnes Nocon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Agnes Nocon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnes Nocon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnes Nocon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Agnes Nocon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnes Nocon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnes Nocon. The network helps show where Agnes Nocon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Agnes Nocon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Agnes Nocon Line = papers co-authored together Agnes Nocon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011231
2 2009213
3 200877
4 200754
5 200544
6 201740
7 201430
8 201528
9 200526
10 200724
11 200722
12 20217
13 20095
14
Pathways into ecstasy use: the role of prior cannabis use and ecstasy availability
20063
15 20123
16 20101
17
Grundlagen und Forschungsstrategien regionaler Bedarfs- und Allokationsforschung am Beispiel des ASAT-F1-Projektes
20120
18 20130

About Agnes Nocon

Agnes Nocon is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Toxicology and Epidemiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (102 citations), Clinical Psychology (255 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (204 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 citations) and Pharmacology (99 citations). Agnes Nocon has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roselind Lieb, Petra Zimmermann, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Hildegard Pfister, Tanja Maria Brückl, Marcus Ising, Jules Angst, Manfred Uhr, Elisabeth B. Binder and Avshalom Caspi. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Psychotraumatology, Depression and Anxiety, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact