Hannah Comteße

1.0k citations
30 papers · 596 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hannah Comteße

28 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Hannah Comteße
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Clinical Psychology 407
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • General Health Professions 149
  • Social Psychology 89
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 123
Replace Judy Wu with:
Judy Wu Canada
Joyce Weeland Netherlands
Alexandra N. Davis United States
Phillip R. Sevigny Canada
Jan Höltge Canada
Samantha Spanos Australia
Jane J. Chung‐Do United States
Helen M. Aucote Australia
María Montero-López Lena Mexico
Glenda Jessup Australia
Hannah Comteße relative to Judy Wu Canada Judy Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Judy Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Comteße

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Comteße's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Comteße with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Comteße more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Comteße

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Comteße. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Comteße. The network helps show where Hannah Comteße may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hannah Comteße, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hannah Comteße Line = papers co-authored together Hannah Comteße links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021119
2 2019104
3 202181
4 202037
5 201937
6 202233
7 202423
8 202019
9 202116
10 202216
11 202413
12 202112
13 202211
14 202011
15 202410
16 20217
17 20167
18 20227
19 20176
20 20236

About Hannah Comteße

Hannah Comteße is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (19 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (19 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (407 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), General Health Professions (149 citations), Social Psychology (89 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (123 citations). Hannah Comteße has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rita Rosner, Anna Vogel, Bettina K. Doering, Verena Ertl, Geert E. Smid, Maria Hagl, Steve Powell, Franziska Lechner‐Meichsner, Maarten C. Eisma and Antonia Barke. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, European journal of psychotraumatology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Affective Disorders and BMC Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact